Published 2026-06-25 | Version v1.0
Policy BriefOpenPublished

Beyond Model Capability

A System-Level Framework for AI Power

Description

This policy brief argues that AI power cannot be reduced to model capability, benchmark performance, parameter scale, or public adoption. It develops a system-level framework in which real-world AI power depends on six interacting dimensions: model capability, data quality, resource access, authority, real-world interface, and rule space. The brief introduces the AI System Power Index (ASPI) as a conceptual and partially quantifiable structure for assessing how AI systems become consequential once embedded in institutions, infrastructure, markets, public services, or security environments.

Abstract

AI competition and capability are often assessed through model performance, benchmark rankings, parameter scale, public adoption, or user reach. These indicators are useful, but they capture only the visible layer of AI capability. In this brief, AI power refers to the capacity of an AI system to shape decisions, mobilize resources, influence behavior, or alter real-world outcomes within a specific institutional, operational, and rule environment. This policy brief argues that AI power depends not only on model capability, but also on data quality, resource access, authority, real-world interfaces, and rule space. A public-facing model may be highly capable but operationally constrained, while a narrower system may have greater real-world impact if it is embedded in institutions, infrastructure, financial systems, or exceptional legal, institutional, or operational environments. The central argument is that AI power is not reducible to model intelligence. It is produced by the broader system that determines what the system can know, access, mobilize, do under authorization, and change.

Files

PDF preview
PDF preview

Mobile browsers may not display embedded PDF previews reliably. Open the PDF directly for the best reading experience.

Open PDF Download PDF
Files
NameType
Beyond Model Capability A System-Level Framework for AI Power.pdf
Full-text PDF of the policy brief
application/pdfDownload

Keywords

  • AI power
  • AI System Power Index
  • ASPI
  • system-level AI power
  • model capability
  • data quality
  • resource access
  • authority
  • real-world interface
  • rule space
  • AI governance
  • AI competition
  • AI policy
  • AI benchmarks
  • AI measurement
  • institutional embedding
  • operational AI
  • data governance
  • resource control
  • authorization
  • accountability
  • public-facing AI
  • enterprise AI
  • critical infrastructure
  • strategic technology
  • EPINOVA

Subjects

  • Artificial intelligence
  • AI governance
  • Technology policy
  • Strategic technology
  • AI measurement
  • AI safety
  • Institutional governance
  • Public policy
  • Digital infrastructure
  • Data governance
  • Critical infrastructure
  • Security studies

Recommended citation

Wu, Shaoyuan (2026), Beyond Model Capability: A System-Level Framework for AI Power, Policy Brief No. EPINOVA–2026–PB–58, Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. https://doi.org/10.67037/epinova.pb.2026.058.

APA citation

Wu, S. (2026). Beyond model capability: A system-level framework for AI power. EPINOVA Policy Brief Series, EPINOVA-PB-2026-058. Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. https://doi.org/10.67037/epinova.pb.2026.058.

Alternate identifiers

SchemeIdentifierDescription
URLhttps://epinova.org/policy-brief-1Official EPINOVA publication page
EPINOVA policy brief numberEPINOVA–2026–PB–58Policy brief number printed in the PDF
File nameBeyond Model Capability A System-Level Framework for AI Power.pdfSource PDF file name
Short titleBeyond Model CapabilityShort form of the policy brief title
Analytical conceptAI System Power IndexQuantifiable index structure proposed in the policy brief for assessing system-level AI power
Analytical conceptASPIAbbreviation for AI System Power Index
Analytical conceptSystem-Level Framework for AI PowerCore framework developed in the policy brief

Related works

RelationIdentifierTypeDescription
IsPartOfhttps://epinova.org/policy-brief-1Publication seriesEPINOVA Policy Brief Series
IsSupplementedByhttps://github.com/EPINOVALLC/EPINOVA-ResearchRepositorySupplementary repository and structural archive
ReferencesAI Index Steering Committee, Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. (2026). The 2026 AI Index report.ReportReferenced for existing AI development, capability, investment, adoption, infrastructure, governance, and responsible AI trend measurement.
ReferencesKim et al. (2025). The AI Power Disparity Index.Conference paperReferenced for emerging work on compound measurement of AI actors’ power to shape the AI ecosystem.
ReferencesOxford Insights. (2025). Government AI Readiness Index 2025.Index reportReferenced for public-sector readiness measurement.
ReferencesTortoise Media. (2024). The Global AI Index.IndexReferenced for national AI capacity ranking across implementation, innovation, and investment.

References

  1. AI Index Steering Committee, Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. (2026). The 2026 AI Index report. Stanford University. https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2026-ai-index-report
  2. Kim, R. M., Kuehnert, B., Lazar, S., Singh, R., & Heidari, H. (2025). The AI Power Disparity Index: Toward a compound measure of AI actors’ power to shape the AI ecosystem. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 8(2), 1453–1464. https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i2.36645
  3. Oxford Insights. (2025). Government AI Readiness Index 2025. https://oxfordinsights.com/ai-readiness/government-ai-readiness-index-2025/
  4. Tortoise Media. (2024). The Global AI Index. https://www.tortoisemedia.com/data/global-ai