Published 2026-05-23 | Version v1.0
Policy BriefOpenPublished

Bargaining Under Systemic Pressure

U.S. Objective Compression, Iranian Leverage Institutionalization, and the Reconfiguration of Negotiating Goals in the 85-Day Conflict

Description

This policy brief analyzes the first 85 days of the U.S.–Iran conflict as a shift from coercive bargaining toward procedural de-escalation. It argues that the conflict produced two parallel dynamics: U.S. objective compression and Iranian leverage institutionalization. The brief treats the reported Pakistan-mediated draft as an unconfirmed but analytically important signal of ceasefire-first sequencing rather than final settlement.

Abstract

This policy brief examines how U.S. and Iranian negotiating objectives changed under cumulative systemic pressure during the first 85 days of the U.S.–Iran conflict. It argues that the conflict did not produce a clear bargaining victory for either side, but instead generated a dual structure of U.S. objective compression and Iranian leverage institutionalization. The United States shifted from coercive termination and strategic degradation of Iranian capabilities toward a narrower focus on suspending hostilities, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, managing the enriched uranium issue, and preserving an exit framework. Iran, meanwhile, expanded the bargaining package by linking settlement to sanctions relief, oil-export access, sovereignty language, security guarantees, Hormuz arrangements, and retention or controlled handling of nuclear assets. The reported Pakistan-mediated draft, if accurate, reinforces this shift by emphasizing immediate ceasefire, mutual non-targeting, freedom of navigation, joint monitoring, follow-on talks within seven days, and phased sanctions relief. The brief concludes that the negotiation became less about battlefield victory than about who could define the architecture of the post-conflict bargain.

Files

PDF preview
PDF preview

Mobile browsers may not display embedded PDF previews reliably. Open the PDF directly for the best reading experience.

Open PDF Download PDF
Files
NameType
Bargaining Under Systemic Pressure U.S. Objective Compression, Iranian Leverage Institutionalization, and the Reconfiguration of Negotiating Goals in the 85-Day Conflict.pdf
Full-text PDF of the policy brief		application/pdfDownload

Keywords

  • U.S.–Iran conflict
  • Iran
  • United States
  • bargaining under pressure
  • objective compression
  • leverage institutionalization
  • ceasefire-first sequencing
  • Strait of Hormuz
  • Hormuz
  • nuclear sequencing
  • enriched uranium
  • sanctions relief
  • maritime governance
  • chokepoint stability
  • Pakistan-mediated draft
  • Qatar mediation
  • systemic bargaining
  • coercive diplomacy
  • conflict termination
  • Middle East security
  • EPINOVA

Subjects

  • International relations
  • Middle East security
  • Strategic studies
  • Conflict termination
  • Coercive diplomacy
  • Maritime security
  • Energy security
  • Nuclear policy
  • Sanctions policy
  • Public policy
  • Political risk

Recommended citation

Wu, Shaoyuan (2026), Bargaining Under Systemic Pressure: U.S. Objective Compression, Iranian Leverage Institutionalization, and the Reconfiguration of Negotiating Goals in the 85-Day Conflict, Policy Brief No. EPINOVA–2026–PB–51, Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. https://doi.org/10.67037/epinova.pb.2026.051.

APA citation

Wu, S. (2026). Bargaining under systemic pressure: U.S. objective compression, Iranian leverage institutionalization, and the reconfiguration of negotiating goals in the 85-day conflict. EPINOVA Policy Brief Series, EPINOVA-PB-2026-051. Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. https://doi.org/10.67037/epinova.pb.2026.051.

Alternate identifiers

SchemeIdentifierDescription
URLhttps://epinova.org/policy-brief-1Official EPINOVA publication page
EPINOVA policy brief numberEPINOVA–2026–PB–51Policy brief number printed in the PDF
File nameBargaining Under Systemic Pressure U.S. Objective Compression, Iranian Leverage Institutionalization, and the Reconfiguration of Negotiating Goals in the 85-Day Conflict.pdfSource PDF file name
Short titleBargaining Under Systemic PressureShort form of the policy brief title

Related works

RelationIdentifierTypeDescription
IsPartOfhttps://epinova.org/policy-brief-1Publication seriesEPINOVA Policy Brief Series
IsSupplementedByhttps://github.com/EPINOVALLC/EPINOVA-ResearchRepositorySupplementary repository and structural archive
ReferencesAppendix Source List in the supplied PDFReference listThe PDF uses an appendix-based sourcing structure with news/media, institutional/regulatory, and EPINOVA source categories.

References

  1. Al Arabiya English. (2026, May 22). Al Arabiya condemns Iranian media for attributing fabricated reports to network. https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2026/05/22/al-arabiya-condemns-iranian-media-for-attributing-fabricated-reports-to-network
  2. Al Arabiya English. (2026, May 22). Pakistan military chief arrives in Tehran in push to end Iran war. https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2026/05/22/pakistan-military-chief-arrives-in-tehran-in-push-to-end-iran-war
  3. Al Arabiya English. (2026, May 22). Rubio cites some progress on Iran talks but “we’re not there yet”. https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2026/05/22/rubio-cites-some-progress-on-iran-talks-but-we-re-not-there-yet
  4. Al Arabiya English. (2026, May 22). US-Iran draft deal mediated by Pakistan could be announced within hours, Al Arabiya source says. https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2026/05/22/usiran-draft-deal-mediated-by-pakistan-could-be-announced-within-hours-al-arabiya-source
  5. Al Arabiya English. (2026, May 23). Iran offers to reopen Strait of Hormuz in exchange for US compensation, sources say. https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2026/05/23/iran-offers-to-reopen-strait-of-hormuz-in-exchange-for-us-compensation-sources-say
  6. Al Jazeera. (2026, April 14). Why are the US, Iran arguing over duration of uranium enrichment ban? https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/14/why-are-the-us-iran-arguing-over-duration-of-uranium-enrichment-ban
  7. Al Jazeera. (2026, May 7). What are US proposals to end war, and will Iran agree to them? https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/5/7/what-are-us-proposals-to-end-war-and-will-iran-agree-to-them
  8. Al Jazeera. (2026, May 22). Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile: Can it be safely transferred? https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/5/22/irans-enriched-uranium-stockpile-can-it-be-safely-transferred
  9. Associated Press. (2026, May 23). Iran and the US are close to an understanding aimed at ending the war, officials say. https://apnews.com/article/1c283f26d037102cc5e6f798546d0e59
  10. Axios. (2026, May 1). Iran offers new response on draft peace deal, Trump “not satisfied”. https://www.axios.com/2026/05/01/iran-peace-plan-response-trump
  11. Axios. (2026, May 6). Exclusive: U.S. and Iran closing in on one-page memo to end war, officials say. https://www.axios.com/2026/05/06/iran-us-deal-one-page-memo
  12. Axios. (2026, May 6). Trump optimistic as U.S. awaits Iran’s response to peace plan. https://www.axios.com/2026/05/06/trump-iran-war-deal-framework-response
  13. Axios. (2026, May 23). U.S., Iran close to a deal to end war, official says. https://www.axios.com/2026/05/23/us-iran-trump-deal-war
  14. InvestingLive. (2026, May 21). US and Iran reach a draft agreement with the mediation of Pakistan — Iran’s ILNA. https://investinglive.com/news/us-and-iran-reach-a-draft-agreement-with-the-mediation-of-pakistan-irans-ilna-20260521/
  15. Reuters. (2026, February 25). US expands sanctions on Iran over oil sales, weapons programs. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-treasury-issues-fresh-iran-related-sanctions-website-shows-2026-02-25/
  16. Reuters. (2026, April 6). Iran, US receive plan to end hostilities, immediate ceasefire, source says. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/iran-us-receive-plan-end-hostilities-immediate-ceasefire-source-says-2026-04-06/
  17. Reuters. (2026, April 27). US reviews latest Iranian proposal to end war stalemate. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/iranian-foreign-minister-heads-russia-trump-says-call-us-negotiate-2026-04-27/
  18. Reuters. (2026, April 28). Trump, unhappy with latest peace proposal, says Iran “not at all” clear on nuclear offer. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/trump-not-happy-with-latest-iran-proposal-end-war-us-official-says-2026-04-28/
  19. Reuters. (2026, May 1). Trump says he’s dissatisfied with Iranian proposal as rift over Hormuz persists. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/uae-says-iran-cannot-be-trusted-over-hormuz-peace-efforts-an-impasse-2026-05-01/
  20. Reuters. (2026, May 7). US and Iran exchange fire, but Trump says ceasefire still in place. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/trump-sees-swift-end-war-iran-reviews-us-peace-proposal-2026-05-07/
  21. Reuters. (2026, May 18). Trump says he paused attack on Iran, signals a nuclear deal may be possible. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/pakistan-hands-us-revised-iranian-proposal-ending-war-2026-05-18/
  22. Reuters. (2026, May 19). Trump says US may strike Iran again but that Tehran wants a deal. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/iran-says-peace-proposal-includes-reparations-war-damage-us-troop-withdrawal-2026-05-19/
  23. Reuters. (2026, May 20). Trump says willing to wait for a few days to get “right” Iran deal. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/tankers-exit-hormuz-trump-vance-talk-up-iran-deal-prospects-2026-05-20/
  24. Reuters. (2026, May 21). Oil prices close 2% lower on uncertain prospects for US-Iran deal. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/oil-rebounds-uncertainty-over-iran-peace-deal-inventory-drawdowns-2026-05-21/
  25. Reuters. (2026, May 22). Qatari negotiating team in Tehran to try to help secure US-Iran deal to end war, says source. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/qatari-negotiating-team-tehran-help-secure-us-iran-deal-end-war-says-source-2026-05-22/
  26. Reuters. (2026, May 23). US and Iran report progress on talks ending war. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/us-iran-report-progress-talks-ending-war-looking-next-few-days-2026-05-23/
  27. Reuters. (2026, May 23). Iran’s top negotiator says Tehran will not compromise in talks with US. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/irans-top-negotiator-says-tehran-will-not-compromise-talks-with-us-2026-05-23/
  28. Reuters. (2026, May 23). Trump says negotiators are getting closer to Iran deal, media interviews show. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/trump-says-negotiators-are-getting-closer-iran-deal-media-interviews-show-2026-05-23/
  29. Reuters. (2026, May 23). Three months in, is Trump losing the Iran war? https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/three-months-is-trump-losing-iran-war-2026-05-23/
  30. The Guardian. (2026, March 25). Iran rejects US ceasefire plan and submits its own amid push for talks. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/25/iran-gives-negative-response-to-us-ceasefire-plan-amid-push-for-talks
  31. The Guardian. (2026, April 19). Tehran has “no plans to participate” in new talks, state media reports. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/19/trumps-sends-delegation-to-pakistan-for-possible-new-round-of-iran-war-talks
  32. The Guardian. (2026, May 22). Qatar sends mediators to Tehran in sign talks to reopen Strait of Hormuz are reaching climax. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/22/uranium-strait-of-hormuz-us-iran-war-talks-pakistan
  33. The Guardian. (2026, May 23). Iran hosts Pakistani delegation amid diplomacy to avert new US strikes. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/23/iran-hosts-pakistani-delegation-diplomacy-to-avert-new-us-strikes
  34. The Times of Israel. (2026, May 22). Saudi network publishes “final draft” of US-Iran deal, claims it could be announced within hours though sides yet to approve it. https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/saudi-network-publishes-final-draft-of-us-iran-deal-claims-it-could-be-announced-within-hours-though-sides-yet-to-approve-it/
  35. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2026). Monitoring and verification in Iran. https://www.iaea.org/topics/monitoring-and-verification-in-iran
  36. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2026, February 27). NPT safeguards agreement with the Islamic Republic of Iran (GOV/2026/8). https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/gov2026-8.pdf
  37. United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text
  38. United Nations. (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
  39. United Nations. (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Part III—Straits used for international navigation. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/part3.htm
  40. U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2026, February 25). Treasury targets Iran’s shadow fleet, networks supplying weapons programs. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0405
  41. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control. (2026). Iran sanctions. https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-information/iran-sanctions
  42. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control. (2026). Sanctions programs and country information. https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-information
  43. Wu, S. (2026). Deterrence under cost pressure: From overmatch to cost imposition in the U.S.–Iran conflict (EPINOVA Policy Brief No. EPINOVA–2026–PB–16). Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19210002
  44. Wu, S. (2026). Divergent war aims: The U.S., Israel, and the strategic logic of divergence in the Iran conflict (EPINOVA Policy Brief No. EPINOVA–2026–PB–17). Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19223653
  45. Wu, S. (2026). Ceasefire under conditions of non-enforcement: Time arbitrage, negotiation dynamics, and controlled de-escalation in the U.S.–Iran conflict with Israeli structural constraints (EPINOVA Policy Brief No. EPINOVA–2026–PB–25). Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19444571
  46. Wu, S. (2026). Ceasefire as recovery competition: Rearmament, external support, and strategic regeneration in a non-enforcement environment (EPINOVA Policy Brief No. EPINOVA–2026–PB–26). Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19464642
  47. Wu, S. (2026). From selective restriction to universal blockade: Legal contestation and third-party naval intervention in the Strait of Hormuz (EPINOVA Policy Brief No. EPINOVA–2026–PB–32). Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19568379
  48. Wu, S. (2026). Escalation without collapse: High-pressure systemic equilibrium in the U.S.–Israel–Iran conflict, Days 1–50 (EPINOVA Policy Brief No. EPINOVA–2026–PB–35). Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19645873
  49. Wu, S. (2026). Who is ready under renewed conflict? A capability–sustainability assessment of the U.S.–Israel–Iran conflict (EPINOVA Policy Brief No. EPINOVA–2026–PB–36). Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19665929