Who Is Ready Under Renewed Conflict?
A Capability–Sustainability Assessment of the U.S.–Israel–Iran Conflict
- Wu, Shaoyuan
Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0660-8232
Description
This policy brief assesses comparative readiness in the U.S.–Israel–Iran conflict through a capability–sustainability framework. It argues that the United States is best positioned for short-duration, high-intensity operations; Iran is structurally better positioned for prolonged cost-imposition conflict; and Israel is operationally effective but constrained by limited strategic depth, multi-front exposure, and escalation lock-in.
Abstract
In the event of renewed hostilities, the United States, Israel, and Iran would enter the conflict with distinct readiness profiles across two core dimensions: immediate military capability and long-term sustainability under systemic pressure. The United States retains decisive short-term combat readiness and the ability to initiate and dominate high-intensity, multi-domain operations. Iran is structurally better positioned for protracted conflict through cost-imposition strategies, distributed systems, and lower-cost offensive capabilities. Israel demonstrates high operational effectiveness but limited sustainability because of geography, force structure, and multi-front exposure. The central implication is that readiness is multidimensional rather than absolute: actors are prepared for different types of conflict, not the same one.
Files
Mobile browsers may not display embedded PDF previews reliably. Open the PDF directly for the best reading experience.
Open PDF Download PDF| Name | Type | |
|---|---|---|
| Who Is Ready Under Renewed Conflict A Capability–Sustainability Assessment of the U.S.–Israel–Iran Conflict.S.–Israel–Iran Conflict.pdf Full-text PDF of the policy brief | application/pdf | Download |
Keywords
- U.S.–Israel–Iran conflict
- Capability readiness
- Sustainability readiness
- Readiness assessment
- Systemic pressure
- Cost-imposition strategy
- Escalation control
- Loss-of-Control Threshold
- LoCT
- Threshold competition
- Protracted conflict
- Short-duration conflict
- Military sustainability
- Strategic endurance
- Escalation lock-in
- Multi-domain operations
- Information warfare
- Networked conflict
- Strategic competition
- Middle East security
- EPINOVA
Subjects
- Strategic studies
- International security
- Military affairs
- Conflict analysis
- Middle East security
- Escalation dynamics
- Systems analysis
- Defense policy
- Geopolitics
- Networked conflict
- Crisis stability
- Policy analysis
- Security governance
Recommended citation
Wu, Shaoyuan (2026), Who Is Ready Under Renewed Conflict? A Capability–Sustainability Assessment of the U.S.–Israel–Iran Conflict, Policy Brief No. EPINOVA–2026–PB–36, Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC,. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19665929.
APA citation
Wu, S. (2026). Who is ready under renewed conflict? A capability–sustainability assessment of the U.S.–Israel–Iran conflict (Policy Brief No. EPINOVA–2026–PB–36). Global AI Governance and Policy Research Center, EPINOVA LLC. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19665929.
Alternate identifiers
| Scheme | Identifier | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DOI | 10.5281/zenodo.19665929 | Zenodo/DataCite DOI stated in the PDF recommended citation |
| ORCID put-code | 212275412 | ORCID Public API record identifier from early metadata |
| EPINOVA policy brief number | EPINOVA–2026–PB–36 | Policy brief number printed in the PDF |
| File name | Who Is Ready Under Renewed Conflict A Capability–Sustainability Assessment of the U.S.–Israel–Iran Conflict.S.–Israel–Iran Conflict.pdf | Source PDF file name |
| Short title | Who Is Ready Under Renewed Conflict? | Short form of the policy brief title |
Related works
| Relation | Identifier | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Related EPINOVA policy brief on systemic pressure and high-pressure equilibrium in the same conflict system | 10.5281/zenodo.19645873 | ||
| Related EPINOVA working paper on threshold competition and Loss-of-Control Threshold dynamics | 10.5281/zenodo.19118195 | ||
| Related EPINOVA working paper providing broader theoretical context for LoCT analysis | 10.5281/zenodo.19139977 |
References
No references listed.